Today’s news #2 – Herne report

In the second big news of the day, Operation Herne’s second report was published. This is the police investigation headed by Mick Creedon (the report is therefore has been referred to as the Creedon report).

This report includes the issue of undercover officers engaging in relationships.

The women and the legal team for this case will be reading this report closely and will comment once they have reviewed its contents.

At the same time, they are preparing to face the police’s application to ‘strike out‘ their legal claims (at a court hearing later this month), as the police say that their own Neither Confirm Nor Deny “policy” stops them from answering claims in court. The women are having to fight battle after battle to get justice for the gross violations of their human rights.

The women’s position has been set out clearly in their statement Where We Stand, in which they assert that there are no circumstances in which relationships should take place, and that the practice shows institutional sexism and institutional prejudice against members of the public engaged in creating social and environmental justice.

We urge supporters of this case to use the lens of the Where We Stand statement when scrutinising all of today’s announcements.

The Guardian – today’s live blog introduced the Herne report at 3.27pm onwards, plus here’s their report on the Herne report.

The Herne Report (also referred to as the Creedon report) is here.


Alison & Helen interviewed on Women’s Hour

Today, BBC Radio 4’s Women’s Hour featured interviews with Alison and Helen about the case.  The programme also features Chief Constable Mick Creedon, who heads Operation Herne (the police review of undercover policing and the Special Demonstration Squad).

The programme can be heard via the BBC iPlayer site HERE.  The interviews start at 00.50 and run until 24.45.


“Neither Confirm Nor Deny” practice criticised – key points over Operation Herne

speakoutDocuments were released today outlining key concerns over the “Neither Confirm Nor Deny” (NCND) practice currently used by police investigating undercover policing. The documents were released following the issue of a press release by the women who are suing the Metropolitan Police, saying that they would not be cooperating with the police investigation.

Operation Herne, the police review into the deployment of undercover officers, takes the line of neither confirming nor denying that the individual men concerned were in fact undercover officers.  The practice of NCND is critiqued in letters from the solicitor representing the women in this case, Harriet Wistrich, to Chief Constable Mick Creedon, the lead officer in Operation Herne.

Here are key points from the letters:

 “The application of the NCND policy by the police has led to the offensive scenario that those investigating the police have requested that our clients…….provide detailed statements and evidence documenting their relationships, whilst being denied even confirmation that the officers about whom they complain were undercover police operatives.”

“If you cannot confirm or deny that a named individual was an undercover officer, how can you begin to publicly provide any comment, following your investigation, on the alleged officer’s activities?”

“….Met Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe was widely quoted in the media as urging ‘the ex-undercover officer who claims smear tactics were used on the family of murdered Stephen Lawrence to get in touch’.  It therefore seems utterly ludicrous and inconsistent for the police to claim that you cannot confirm the officers who have already confessed to their previous activities.”

“The adoption of NCND is a tactic to avoid any public acknowledgement or scrutiny of gross human rights abuses carried out by these officers.”

“We consider that any investigation or inquiry must be independent and transparent, unfettered by any policy of NCND and free of the taint of the police investigating the police.”


Correspondence released by Birnberg Peirce and partners

Following today’s announcement that the women taking legal action have written to Chief Constable Creedon to say that they will not cooperate with Operation Herne, the following documents have now been released. They outline the correspondence between the women’s solicitor, Harriet Wistrich of Birnberg Peirce and partners, and Chief Constable Creedon. The letters from Wistrich outline the women’s concerns over Operation Herne and the Neither Confirm Nor Deny (NCND) “policy”.

Document 1 – July 2013:
Letter from Harriet Wistrich to Keith Vaz MP, in the latter’s capacity as Chair of the Home Affairs Committee. This letter was forwarded by Vaz to Chief Constable Creedon.

Document 2 – 12 August 2013:
Letter from Chief Constable Creedon to Harriet Wistrich.

Document 3 – 21 August 2013:
Letter from Harriet Wistrich to Chief Constable Creedon.

For further information contact the claimants’ solicitor, Harriet Wistrich at Birnberg Peirce and Partners – 020 7911 0166 or email (checked after hours).


Press release: Women reject secrecy of undercover policing inquiry

For immediate release: Eight women suing* the Metropolitan police for the harm caused by undercover police officers forming fraudulent long-term, intimate, sexual relationships with them, have written to Chief Constable Creedon to say that they will not cooperate with Operation Herne**. Chief Constable Creedon had asked them to provide detailed statements about their intimate relationships, but had simultaneously asserted that it is necessary for the police to maintain a “policy” of “neither confirm nor deny” (NCND) – meaning that the women could never know the outcome of the investigations.

The women say their trust in the police has been so fundamentally undermined by their experiences of deceit at the hands of the police that they will only cooperate with an independent investigation and /or public inquiry. They have however welcomed Chief Constable Creedon’s statement that such intimate, sexual relationships should not be permitted under any circumstances, a position which he says reflects the view of the three lead officers on undercover policing from the Association of Chief Police Officers.

Despite this acknowledgement that the relationships could not be justified, it appears that the Police are determined to prevent any public scrutiny of their highly intrusive practices – the Metropolitan Police have threatened to apply to have the claims struck out as unfair to the police and to apply for a “closed material procedure” hearing under the powers of the new Justice and Security Act. A CMP means that the police can keep evidence secret – they could put material before the judge which neither the Claimants or their lawyers would be able to see or challenge.

This comes on top of their efforts to have the Human Rights claims heard in the extremely secretive Investigatory Powers Tribunal, the women have taken this challenge to the Court of Appeal and a hearing is fixed for 15 and 16 October 2013.

The women condemn the police for spending from what appears to be an unlimited pot of public money on legal arguments that seek to hide details of practices that amount to grave interferences with the women’s fundamental rights to privacy, personal integrity and protection from inhumane and degrading treatment. The only way that the women can hope to achieve justice is if the police are willing to be open and publicly accountable for their actions

Harriet Wistrich, solicitor for the eight women, said

“It is time for the police to come clean and admit to the undoubted wrongdoing. All these women have been seriously harmed by a practice which is now acknowledged as wrong under any circumstance. The effect of being spied upon has fundamentally undermined my clients’ ability to trust not only the police but relationships in general. The obstructive and secretive response of the police to these cases is only serving to undermine it further.”



*Legal action was commenced in December 2011 against the Metropolitan Police on behalf of eight women who were deceived into having long term intimate relationships with undercover police officers. The five undercover officers were all engaged in infiltrating environmental and social justice campaign groups between the mid 1980’s and 2010 and had relationships with the women lasting from 7 months and the longest spanning 9 years. The five undercover officers are Bob Lambert, John Dines, Jim Boyling, Mark Cassidy and Mark Kennedy.

The women assert that the actions of the undercover officers breached their rights as protected by the European Convention on Human Rights, including Article 3 (no one shall be subject to inhumane and degrading treatment) and Article 8 (respect for private and family life, including the right to form relationships without unjustified interference by the state), The women are also bringing claims for deceit, assault, misfeasance in public office and negligence, and seek to highlight and prevent the continuation of psychological, emotional and sexual abuse of campaigners and others by undercover police officers.

** Chief Constable Creedon is in charge of Operation Herne – a police review of the use of undercover officers in the Special Demonstration Squad

Please also refer to where copies of the relevant correspondence between Operation Herne and Birnberg Peirce and partners will be available later this afternoon [30 August 2013].
UPDATE: The correspondence has now been released and can be found here.

For further information contact the claimants’ solicitor, Harriet Wistrich at Birnberg Peirce and Partners – 020 7911 0166 or email (checked after hours).


Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by A.N.

Up ↑